Doklam Agreement

Despite the agreement, the People`s Liberation Army crossed Bhutan in 1988 and took control of the Chumbi Valley near the Doklam Plateau. There have been reports of PLA troops threatening the Bhutanese guards, declared them on Chinese soil, and occupied and occupied Bhutanese positions for long periods. [41] Even after the year 2000, many intruders, pastures, and road and infrastructure constructions were reported by the Chinese, as reported to the Bhutan National Assembly. [60] The fact is that Doklam is strategic for India because of the chicken neck. But over the past two years, Modi has done nothing to solve the Doklam problem. In addition, Bhutan has seen that Modi is powerless, while Modi complains about the elections and deceives Indian public opinion. So it is time for Bhutan to make up for the problem, as Modi has no strength or ability to make any pull. The Bhutanese government informed China that “the construction of the road inside Bhutanese territory constitutes a direct violation of the agreements and affects the border delimitation process between our two countries.” On June 30, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said, “Such a construction would represent a significant change in the status quo, with serious repercussions for India`s security.” Bhutan and China have held 24 rounds since border talks began in 1984. The royal government of Bhutan claims that the ongoing road construction on the Doklam Plateau constitutes a unilateral modification by China of a controversial border, contrary to agreements reached between the two nations in 1988 and 1998. The agreements also prohibit the use of force and encourage both sides to strictly adhere to the use of peaceful means.

India has long supported Bhutan`s claim and, according to a press release from india`s foreign ministry on the continuing impasse in 2012, it has reached an agreement with China that the existing “tri-junction border points” between the two countries and third parties “be concluded in agreement with the countries concerned.” The deal is not public, but in a recent interview, former Indian Foreign Minister Shivshankar Menon called the deal a “broad understanding.” China`s Foreign Ministry made no reference to the 2012 agreement in its various statements on the impasse since the impasse began. India accuses China of violating this “peace agreement” by trying to build roads in Doklam. [77] “This is the best testimony to this fact. We ask the Indian side to face the facts, abide by the provisions of the historic border treaty and the agreement of the parties, and cooperate with the Chinese side to maintain peace and tranquility in the border regions,” he said in a written response to a question about Sitharaman`s visit. Beginning in 1958, Chinese maps showed much of Bhutanese territory as part of China. [22] Local tensions erupted in the 1960s, but in the 1970s, negotiations between China and Bhutan, where India sometimes played a supporting role, failed to reach consensus on the status of the Doklam Plateau. Since their beginning in 1984, Bhutan and China have held 24 rounds of border talks, with remarkable agreements reached in 1988 and 1998, which also prohibit the use of force and encourage both sides to strictly respect peaceful means. The 70-day Doklam debate in 2017 culminated in an agreement on the withdrawal of both sides, but China continued to make itself felt in the surrounding region.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.