In his essay Hidden Tibet: History of Independence and Occupation, published by the Library of Tibetan Works and Archives in Dharamsala, S.L. Kuzmin writes that the agreement had critical flaws. [21] The use of new body seals instead of official government seals was not legal. Tibetan delegates overstepped their authority by signing the agreement without the agreement of the Dalai Lama and Kashag. The preamble to the agreement contained ideological stereotypes that do not correspond to reality. The Chinese government ordered the People`s Liberation Army soldiers who invaded Tibet to order the “local” government to send its people to negotiate with the Center (i.e., the central government); the parties recognized this in the preamble and in point 2, so that the agreement was signed under military threat. The agreement was drafted in such a way that a number of concepts were ambiguous and allowed for different interpretations on the part of the Chinese and Tibetans. It also contains some internal contradictions. [21] There is now a presumption of openness at the IMF and the World Bank and an agreement on the establishment of a formal mechanism for evaluating IMF policies and operations. The G7 agreement reflects the G7`s determination to modernize the financial system and establish new rules and procedures to promote stability and growth.. . .
.